REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.


General Discussion >> Surfer Discussion

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
Hump
Miki Dora status
**

Reged: 01/10/02
Posts: 4687
Loc: Vancouver Island
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2296541 - 04/26/12 05:36 PM

Quote:

Quote:

You can pursue them against the recommendation of said cops and then argue self-defense
after you shoot them.




Get this through your thick fuckkking skull. According to Zimmerman, the only eyewitness,
Zimmerman did not pursue Martin after the police dispatcher's recommendation. He turned around
and walked toward his car.

..




No he didn't.

Had he turned back and headed for his truck he would have told the dispatcher on the 911 call where the cops could find him when they arrived.
In fact he initially told the dispatcher to have the cops meet him at the mailboxes near the entrance but then he quickly changed his mind and told the dispatcher to have the cops call him when they arrived and he'd tell him where he was in order to meet up with them.

Now why did he do that?

He did that because he DIDN'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS GOING TO BE BECAUSE HE WAS IN PURSUIT!!!!

Simple enough even Squidley can understand it.

Get it??

Had he stayed put he would have told the cops where he was and where to meet him.
He couldn't do that because he was on the move ....NOT back towards his truck but on the move after the kid.

Why??

"These assholes always get away."

Like the time before.

But not this time.

Totally Zimmerman's fault this happened but I think he'll walk on Murder Two.

I also feel sorry for the poor bugger 'cause he knows he did wrong and now he's in quite the jam.

And of course the kid's dead too.

Sad tragedy all around.

Take care.

--------------------
Learn to surf in only 3,247 lessons.
I did.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: Hump]
      #2296581 - 04/26/12 07:04 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You can pursue them against the recommendation of said cops and then argue self-defense
after you shoot them.




Get this through your thick fuckkking skull. According to Zimmerman, the only eyewitness,
Zimmerman did not pursue Martin after the police dispatcher's recommendation. He turned around
and walked toward his car.

..




No he didn't.

Had he turned back and headed for his truck he would have told the dispatcher on the 911 call where the cops could find him when they arrived.
In fact he initially told the dispatcher to have the cops meet him at the mailboxes near the entrance but then he quickly changed his mind and told the dispatcher to have the cops call him when they arrived and he'd tell him where he was in order to meet up with them.

Now why did he do that?

He did that because he DIDN'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS GOING TO BE BECAUSE HE WAS IN PURSUIT!!!!

Simple enough even Squidley can understand it.

Get it??

Had he stayed put he would have told the cops where he was and where to meet him.
He couldn't do that because he was on the move ....NOT back towards his truck but on the move after the kid.

Why??

"These assholes always get away."

Like the time before.

But not this time.

Totally Zimmerman's fault this happened but I think he'll walk on Murder Two.

I also feel sorry for the poor bugger 'cause he knows he did wrong and now he's in quite the jam.

And of course the kid's dead too.

Sad tragedy all around.

Take care.





Frvcvs challenged me on a point which was proven in a particular part of the conversation
between Zimmerman and the dispatcher. Sequence here is the only thing that matters, and you,
like frvcvs, have the sequence wrong. Zimmerman initially told the police dispatcher where he
would be before following Martin. Nobody is disputing that Zimmerman followed Martin after
that. Later came the dispatcher's question over whether Zimmerman was following Martin, the
dispatcher's advice to stop, and Zimmerman turning around. So Zimmerman would not be where
he initially told the dispatcher. We're all together on that.

After about another minute Zimmerman stopped before approaching his car, and started another
conversation with the dispatcher. Zimmerman started telling the dispatcher some pertinent facts.
I'm not sure whether or not he gave her a new location. What's important is that's when and
where the altercation took place. It's where Martin's body was found.

Unless you can retroactively move Martin's body, the physical evidence corresponds with the
dispatch recording and with Zimmerman's account.
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
huryanpost
Billy Hamilton status
*

Reged: 12/09/10
Posts: 1557
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2296583 - 04/26/12 07:12 PM

Sequence here is the only thing that matters, and you,
like frvcvs, have the sequence wrong. zimmerman was masturbating then he pulled the trigger.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Norm'
Duke status
**

Reged: 01/31/03
Posts: 18682
Loc: Lovetron
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2296606 - 04/26/12 07:51 PM

Quote:

Quote:

You two are such HUGE puzzies.

I'll give you an actual example, in which you would have considered me an "aggressor". My wife and I were driving home from a late night dinner. We saw a woman walking, and two late teen to early 20 somethings, running behind her, then diving into bushes and behind cars. It LOOKED like she was being stalked. I pulled into the parking lot, where the guy in the lead was prone, behind a mound, put my high beams on, and got out of my truck. (according to you two, I'm officially now an aggressor). I walked up to his poor hiding spot and said "What's going on? What are you doing?". He was flustered and stammering, which made it a little more suspicious. The woman came walking back, and said that they were her kids, and they were trying to see if they could hide from cars, on the walk back from the store.

Was I aggressive? Should I have called called the cops and just hoped that she got home OK?

There are a million+ factors that we don't know. So, for every GUESS that you have there's a counter GUESS.




You did the right thing. You also showed restraint and didn't shoot them which is good.

The big difference is you had reason to believe there was a crime in progress with a visible victim. If you didn't see the woman would you have stopped and done the same thing?




If it was in my neighborhood, where there had been recent crimes, and I had signed on to keep watch, I may have done the same thing. What happens next decides the outcome.

THAT'S what we don't know.

--------------------
"I mean, it's not your job to be as confused as Nigel."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23021
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2296906 - 04/27/12 10:11 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You can pursue them against the recommendation of said cops and then argue self-defense
after you shoot them.




Get this through your thick fuckkking skull. According to Zimmerman, the only eyewitness,
Zimmerman did not pursue Martin after the police dispatcher's recommendation. He turned around
and walked toward his car.

..




No he didn't.

Had he turned back and headed for his truck he would have told the dispatcher on the 911 call where the cops could find him when they arrived.
In fact he initially told the dispatcher to have the cops meet him at the mailboxes near the entrance but then he quickly changed his mind and told the dispatcher to have the cops call him when they arrived and he'd tell him where he was in order to meet up with them.

Now why did he do that?

He did that because he DIDN'T KNOW WHERE HE WAS GOING TO BE BECAUSE HE WAS IN PURSUIT!!!!

Simple enough even Squidley can understand it.

Get it??

Had he stayed put he would have told the cops where he was and where to meet him.
He couldn't do that because he was on the move ....NOT back towards his truck but on the move after the kid.

Why??

"These assholes always get away."

Like the time before.

But not this time.

Totally Zimmerman's fault this happened but I think he'll walk on Murder Two.

I also feel sorry for the poor bugger 'cause he knows he did wrong and now he's in quite the jam.

And of course the kid's dead too.

Sad tragedy all around.

Take care.





Frvcvs challenged me on a point which was proven in a particular part of the conversation
between Zimmerman and the dispatcher. Sequence here is the only thing that matters, and you,
like frvcvs, have the sequence wrong. Zimmerman initially told the police dispatcher where he
would be before following Martin. Nobody is disputing that Zimmerman followed Martin after
that. Later came the dispatcher's question over whether Zimmerman was following Martin, the
dispatcher's advice to stop, and Zimmerman turning around. So Zimmerman would not be where
he initially told the dispatcher. We're all together on that.

After about another minute Zimmerman stopped before approaching his car, and started another
conversation with the dispatcher. Zimmerman started telling the dispatcher some pertinent facts.
I'm not sure whether or not he gave her a new location. What's important is that's when and
where the altercation took place. It's where Martin's body was found.

Unless you can retroactively move Martin's body, the physical evidence corresponds with the
dispatch recording and with Zimmerman's account.
..





Did you just pull that out of your recently penetrated a$$hole? You never proved a fvcking thing so don't claim to have.

--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mo_Fo
Kelly Slater status
**

Reged: 04/13/05
Posts: 7707
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2296909 - 04/27/12 10:15 AM






--------------------
"Your ego is not your amigo" ~Tony Alva


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2296914 - 04/27/12 10:28 AM

Quote:

Did you just pull that out of your recently penetrated a$$hole? You never proved a
fvcking thing so don't claim to have.





You're way to interested in penetrating assholes. Thanks. No. I'm straight.

I did not provide links because, 1) The primary source is an audio recording .....the same reason
the asshole on your side provided no links, and 2) It's impossible to prove a negative. The idiot
Hump argued simply that, since Zimmerman provided no location where he would meet the cops,
he was planning to attack Martin.

The statement, on its own, is just bullshit.

How much more sensationalism can you generate out of your own stupid agenda-driven
misunderstanding of a simple cut-and-dried event?
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hump
Miki Dora status
**

Reged: 01/10/02
Posts: 4687
Loc: Vancouver Island
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2296939 - 04/27/12 11:24 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Did you just pull that out of your recently penetrated a$$hole? You never proved a
fvcking thing so don't claim to have.





You're way to interested in penetrating assholes. Thanks. No. I'm straight.

I did not provide links because, 1) The primary source is an audio recording .....the same reason
the asshole on your side provided no links, and 2) It's impossible to prove a negative. The idiot
Hump argued simply that, since Zimmerman provided no location where he would meet the cops,
he was planning to attack Martin.

True to form you're still a liar Squidley, I said no such thing. I simply pointed out the absolutely most logical reason why Zimmerman couldn't give a location where the cops could find him was that he didn't know where he was going to be.

Why?

Because he was going to go find this kid (pursue him) and he wasn't sure where the kid was.
I said nothing about Zimmerman planning to attack Martin or anything remotely resembling that. You're simply another little twerp who lies regularly and when confronted with reality resorts to calling people "idiots" and the like.

The sequence in the tape of the 911 call is quite clear and, naturally, differs from your fictional account.


The statement, on its own, is just bullshit.

You're the expert on bullshit but once again you're wrong.
Simply wrong.
Deal with it.


How much more sensationalism can you generate out of your own stupid agenda-driven
misunderstanding of a simple cut-and-dried event?

Unlike ideological idiots like you I have no agenda at all, save getting at the facts. You try to create facts from cow-crap all the time which makes one wonder what's your agenda?
White supremacist?
Bigot?
Simply stupid?
Right wing whackjob?



..






Take care.

--------------------
Learn to surf in only 3,247 lessons.
I did.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bloomies
Phil Edwards status
**

Reged: 09/27/08
Posts: 7177
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: Hump]
      #2296967 - 04/27/12 11:44 AM

Quote:

which makes one wonder what's your agenda?
White supremacist?
Bigot?
Simply stupid?
Right wing whackjob?



..






Take care.





Hmmmm, so many to choose from! Serial liar is missing tho'.....

--------------------
If the logical end of communism is the gulag, then the logical end of capitalism is the Mafia.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23021
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2296977 - 04/27/12 12:01 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Did you just pull that out of your recently penetrated a$$hole? You never proved a
fvcking thing so don't claim to have.





You're way to interested in penetrating assholes. Thanks. No. I'm straight.

I did not provide links because, 1) The primary source is an audio recording .....the same reason
the asshole on your side provided no links, and 2) It's impossible to prove a negative. The idiot
Hump argued simply that, since Zimmerman provided no location where he would meet the cops,
he was planning to attack Martin.

The statement, on its own, is just bullshit.

How much more sensationalism can you generate out of your own stupid agenda-driven
misunderstanding of a simple cut-and-dried event?
..




The simple fact is that from the information thats been made public we don't know if he actually turned back or not. There's nothing in that call thats suggests whether he did or didn't. And like a lying sack of sh!t who's so eager to prove the black guy wrong you're claiming he turned back as fact. What is fact is that he pursued Martin. He admitted that on the 911 call. You can hear the door open indicator on his car when he opens the door and leaves his vehicle, you can hear him huffing and puffing as he runs (not walks) after Martin and you can hear the wind resistance on the phone. Which is what prompted the Police Officer on the line to ask if he was pursuing Martin which Zimmerman readily admitted. That makes this part of the story fact. What's up for interpretation is what happened after that. Prosecutors will be able to piece together a better timeline using the time stamp on the 911 call along with information like where Zimmerman's car was parked and the distance to the scene of the shooting along with the time stamps on the other 911 calls to determine if it's likely he had time to turn back or not before the altercation and shooting went down. But until that happens you have no basis to say he did. Which I believe makes you the liar.

--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hump
Miki Dora status
**

Reged: 01/10/02
Posts: 4687
Loc: Vancouver Island
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: bloomies]
      #2296979 - 04/27/12 12:03 PM

Someone once asked Squidley: "How stupid can you be?"

Squidley apparently took it as a challenge.


Take care.

--------------------
Learn to surf in only 3,247 lessons.
I did.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Norm'
Duke status
**

Reged: 01/31/03
Posts: 18682
Loc: Lovetron
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2296980 - 04/27/12 12:06 PM

Maybe Zimmerman shot Trayvon, because Trayvon gave Mrs. Zimmerman a foot rub.



The truth is, no one knows why Zimmerman shot Trayvon, except Zimmerman.

--------------------
"I mean, it's not your job to be as confused as Nigel."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2297035 - 04/27/12 01:59 PM

Quote:

The simple fact is that from the information thats been made public we don't know if he
actually turned back or not. There's nothing in that call thats suggests whether he did or didn't.
And like a lying sack of sh!t who's so eager to prove the black guy wrong you're claiming he
turned back as fact. What is fact is that he pursued Martin. He admitted that on the 911 call. You
can hear the door open indicator on his car when he opens the door and leaves his vehicle, you
can hear him huffing and puffing as he runs (not walks) after Martin and you can hear the wind
resistance on the phone. Which is what prompted the Police Officer on the line to ask if he was
pursuing Martin which Zimmerman readily admitted. That makes this part of the story fact.
What's up for interpretation is what happened after that. Prosecutors will be able to piece together
a better timeline using the time stamp on the 911 call along with information like where
Zimmerman's car was parked and the distance to the scene of the shooting along with the time
stamps on the other 911 calls to determine if it's likely he had time to turn back or not before the
altercation and shooting went down. But until that happens you have no basis to say he did.
Which I believe makes you the liar.





Then what you're doing is admitting that you have been lying about when Zimmerman told the
police dispatcher that he was following Martin. All through three massive threads now, you've
been saying that Zimmerman "pursued" Martin after the police dispatcher warned him not to.
You just admitted you were lying, but now we're supposed to believe your NEW story.

.....shuck ....jive ....

After Zimmerman's admission the police dispatcher told Zimmerman "We're not going to need
you to" follow Martin. As I've stated all along, Zimmerman was the only eyewitness to what
happen next. According to his police statement he turned around and proceeded toward his car.

Get this through your thick fuckkking skull. Unless the police and prosecutors produce evidence
which disproves Zimmerman's testimony, then under the law Zimmerman gets the benefit of the
doubt. I'm not saying what Zimmerman did, I'm saying just what the law says. Zimmerman is
assumed innocent until there is "reasonable cause" to find otherwise.

But as other posters have pointed out, even if Zimmerman had disregarded the dispatcher's
advice and kept following Martin, it would mean NOTHING to Martin's guilt or innocense in
this case. Zimmerman had every right to follow Martin. Following is neither a crime nor a deadly
threat. What is BOTH a crime AND a deadly threat is when Martin attacked Zimmerman and
started bashing his brains out.

We would have to assume, because Zimmerman was arrested and charged with murder, that the
prosecutor had evidence which counters Zimmerman's account of these events, but this
prosecutor only filed charges after you race pimps applied political pressure. These charges can
only be politically motivated.
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23021
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2297056 - 04/27/12 02:26 PM

Quote:

Quote:

The simple fact is that from the information thats been made public we don't know if he
actually turned back or not. There's nothing in that call thats suggests whether he did or didn't.
And like a lying sack of sh!t who's so eager to prove the black guy wrong you're claiming he
turned back as fact. What is fact is that he pursued Martin. He admitted that on the 911 call. You
can hear the door open indicator on his car when he opens the door and leaves his vehicle, you
can hear him huffing and puffing as he runs (not walks) after Martin and you can hear the wind
resistance on the phone. Which is what prompted the Police Officer on the line to ask if he was
pursuing Martin which Zimmerman readily admitted. That makes this part of the story fact.
What's up for interpretation is what happened after that. Prosecutors will be able to piece together
a better timeline using the time stamp on the 911 call along with information like where
Zimmerman's car was parked and the distance to the scene of the shooting along with the time
stamps on the other 911 calls to determine if it's likely he had time to turn back or not before the
altercation and shooting went down. But until that happens you have no basis to say he did.
Which I believe makes you the liar.





Then what you're doing is admitting that you have been lying about when Zimmerman told the
police dispatcher that he was following Martin. All through three massive threads now, you've
been saying that Zimmerman "pursued" Martin after the police dispatcher warned him not to.
You just admitted you were lying, but now we're supposed to believe your NEW story.

.....shuck ....jive ....

After Zimmerman's admission the police dispatcher told Zimmerman "We're not going to need
you to" follow Martin. As I've stated all along, Zimmerman was the only eyewitness to what
happen next. According to his police statement he turned around and proceeded toward his car.

Get this through your thick fuckkking skull. Unless the police and prosecutors produce evidence
which disproves Zimmerman's testimony, then under the law Zimmerman gets the benefit of the
doubt. I'm not saying what Zimmerman did, I'm saying just what the law says. Zimmerman is
assumed innocent until there is "reasonable cause" to find otherwise.

But as other posters have pointed out, even if Zimmerman had disregarded the dispatcher's
advice and kept following Martin, it would mean NOTHING to Martin's guilt or innocense in
this case. Zimmerman had every right to follow Martin. Following is neither a crime nor a deadly
threat. What is BOTH a crime AND a deadly threat is when Martin attacked Zimmerman and
started bashing his brains out.

We would have to assume, because Zimmerman was arrested and charged with murder, that the
prosecutor had evidence which counters Zimmerman's account of these events, but this
prosecutor only filed charges after you race pimps applied political pressure. These charges can
only be politically motivated.
..





The only reason to believe that Zimmerman turned back is because he said he turned back. There's tons of holes in his story and he has motive to lie to cover his own ass being that he did shoot a kid to death and all

--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ifallalot
Duke status
**

Reged: 12/17/08
Posts: 17938
Loc: Carlsbad, CA
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2297069 - 04/27/12 02:44 PM

this has nothing to do with race and you are the one who keeps pulling the race card squid.

this is about suspicion which turned into pursuit which turned into agression which turned into murder.

would have Zimmerman been as suspicious of Martin if Martin would have been another race or even a multi-racial person like Zimmerman? Only George knows. And only George knows what really happened and I will agree with those who say the media made this about race

All I know is that I am going to shoot a 17 year old black kid soon because idiots around America have donated nearly $300,000 to Zimmerman and Zimmerman still got a bail bond . Papa needs a house!

--------------------
The only two things in life that make it worth livin is guitars tuned good and firm feelin women


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2297142 - 04/27/12 04:25 PM

Quote:

The only reason to believe that Zimmerman turned back is because he said he turned
back. There's tons of holes in his story and he has motive to lie to cover his own ass being that he
did shoot a kid to death and all





What did you just quote? What did I just say? I said: "As I've stated all along, Zimmerman was
the only eyewitness to what happen next. According to his police statement he turned around and
proceeded toward his car."

Followed by: "Unless the police and prosecutors produce evidence which disproves Zimmerman's
testimony, then under the law Zimmerman gets the benefit of the doubt. I'm not saying what
Zimmerman did, I'm saying just what the law says. Zimmerman is assumed innocent until there is
"reasonable cause" to find otherwise."

Thanks for citing all the holes in Zimmerman's story. Oh wait. You cited nothing ....in three
massive threads. And thanks for demonstrating once again that you have no regard for the law or
justice.

Yet we're supposed to side with you.
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: ifallalot]
      #2297143 - 04/27/12 04:25 PM

Quote:

this has nothing to do with race and you are the one who keeps pulling the race card squid.

this is about suspicion which turned into pursuit which turned into agression which turned into murder.

would have Zimmerman been as suspicious of Martin if Martin would have been another race or even a
multi-racial person like Zimmerman? Only George knows. And only George knows what really happened
and I will agree with those who say the media made this about race

All I know is that I am going to shoot a 17 year old black kid soon because idiots around America have
donated nearly $300,000 to Zimmerman and Zimmerman still got a bail bond . Papa needs a house!





So you don't remember the President of the United States appealing for prosecutors to throw
Zimmerman in the slammer because Martin "looked like he could be my son"?

You don't remember the 9-page SurferMag thread?
So if Obama claimed that Trayvon Martin could have been his son

You don't remember the 7-page SurferMag thread which started all of this?
Concealed carry permits protecting Americans from black kids with skittles

.....with charges that Zimmerman "pursued" Martin because he was black?

Three massive threads of you race pimps demanding that Zimmerman be prosecuted because the
man who attacked him was black. And you have yet to bring up one "hole" which amounts to
anything but weasely leftist race bait.
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23021
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2297159 - 04/27/12 04:51 PM

Quote:

Quote:

this has nothing to do with race and you are the one who keeps pulling the race card squid.

this is about suspicion which turned into pursuit which turned into agression which turned into murder.

would have Zimmerman been as suspicious of Martin if Martin would have been another race or even a
multi-racial person like Zimmerman? Only George knows. And only George knows what really happened
and I will agree with those who say the media made this about race

All I know is that I am going to shoot a 17 year old black kid soon because idiots around America have
donated nearly $300,000 to Zimmerman and Zimmerman still got a bail bond . Papa needs a house!





So you don't remember the President of the United States appealing for prosecutors to throw
Zimmerman in the slammer because Martin "looked like he could be my son"?

You don't remember the 9-page SurferMag thread?
So if Obama claimed that Trayvon Martin could have been his son

You don't remember the 7-page SurferMag thread which started all of this?
Concealed carry permits protecting Americans from black kids with skittles

.....with charges that Zimmerman "pursued" Martin because he was black?

Three massive threads of you race pimps demanding that Zimmerman be prosecuted because the
man who attacked him was black. And you have yet to bring up one "hole" which amounts to
anything but weasely leftist race bait.
..





You know I'd actually respect you more if you were just honest with us and said what we all know. That you hate black people. You've made it abundantly clear here for years. You constantly call anyone who disagrees with you a liar when the one consistent lie that comes from you in every discussion is that you're not a racist and a bigot. The truth is that you're as racist and religiously elitist as anyone I've ever encountered in my life. Unless of course you're a troll and this is just a schtick, if that's the case you've been remarkably consistent.



--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB

Edited by frvcvs (04/27/12 05:07 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bloomies
Phil Edwards status
**

Reged: 09/27/08
Posts: 7177
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2297170 - 04/27/12 05:14 PM

Quote:

So you don't remember the President of the United States appealing for prosecutors to throw
Zimmerman in the slammer because Martin "looked like he could be my son"?




cereal liar

You putting milk in that bowl of shiiite?

--------------------
If the logical end of communism is the gulag, then the logical end of capitalism is the Mafia.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GWS
Duke status
***

Reged: 01/11/02
Posts: 32155
Loc: Dustopia
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: bloomies]
      #2297172 - 04/27/12 05:19 PM

You guys all did hear that Zimmerman got arrested and he's going to trial? I think they can handle this without input from the erBB. You can probably all relax a little.

But I could be wrong.




--------------------
Only a fool trips over what’s behind them


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pissbiscuit
Gerry Lopez status
**

Reged: 06/25/08
Posts: 1150
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: GWS]
      #2297174 - 04/27/12 05:22 PM

Quote:

You guys all did hear that Zimmerman got arrested and he's going to trial? I think they can handle this without input from the erBB. You can probably all relax a little.

But I could be wrong.







Why do you hate page 10 so much?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23021
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: GWS]
      #2297175 - 04/27/12 05:24 PM

I'm being paid by George Soros for this, it's my job.



--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2297185 - 04/27/12 06:21 PM

Quote:

You know I'd actually respect you more if you were just honest with us and said what we
all know. That you hate black people. You've made it abundantly clear here for years. You
constantly call anyone who disagrees with you a liar when the one consistent lie that comes from
you in every discussion is that you're not a racist and a bigot. The truth is that you're as racist and
religiously elitist as anyone I've ever encountered in my life. Unless of course you're a troll and
this is just a schtick, if that's the case you've been remarkably consistent.





But I was answering Ifallalot's charge. Ifallalot said the only thing which made this issue about
race was my charge that you leftist assholes made it about race.

I didn't open this subject on SurferMag with charges of racism:
Concealed carry permits protecting Americans from black kids with skittles

You did. And throughout the thread you charged that Zimmerman stalked and murdered poor
innocent little Trayvon Martin for being a black kid.

Yes, throughout these three threads I've charged you with lying. And each time I've given solid
evidence of your lies. I also provided evidence of your race baiting, although it tends to be self
evident.

About me you claimed "you hate black people", and "you're as racist and religiously elitist as
anyone I've ever encountered in my life". If I didn't have solid evidence on these pages that you
are a lying racist it might mean something. As it stands, it's just a bullshit artist's attempt to
try and discredit the facts of this case. You have yet to offer any evidence whatsoever. We're
just supposed to believe you.

Sorry, I don't believe liars. This is an ad hominem attack, and not even a good one. It proves the
addage, if you can't dazzle them with facts then baffle them with bullshit.
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RbrOutlier
Gerry Lopez status
**

Reged: 06/04/11
Posts: 1233
Loc: Rubber
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2297192 - 04/27/12 06:40 PM

Quote:

Zimmerman stalked and murdered poor
innocent little Trayvon Martin for being a black kid.






am I actually quoting Skully above or just you ??

--------------------
establish Justice, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: ilparadosso]
      #2310705 - 05/17/12 09:59 AM

.
I'm sure everyone has seen Zimmerman's doctor reports. Zimmerman had gashes and bruises to
the back of his head. He also had a broken nose and two black eyes.

And still the prosecution pursues this case. But now the medical examiner has released his report
on the autopsy of Trayvon Martin.

Autopsy results reportedly indicate Trayvon Martin suffered injuries to knuckles

It says Martin had extensive cuts and bruising on his knuckles. These results are consistent with
Zimmerman's report that Martin punched Zimmerman in the face.

And still the prosecution pursues this case.


But wait. Remember the mainstream media headlines just a few weeks ago?

March 29, 2012: Martin funeral director: No signs of fight on body
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Trayvon Martin was buried in Miami with a gunshot wound to his chest. But otherwise,
according to Richard Kurtz, the funeral director who prepared Martin for burial, his body showed
no injuries.

"We could see no physical signs like there had been a scuffle [or] there had been a fight," he said.
"The hands -- I didn't see any knuckles, bruises or what have you. And that is something we
would have covered up if it would have been there."
-------------------------------------------------------------------


So we have CBS News and the black funeral director, the one hired by the black Martin family,
saying there were no marks on Martin's knuckles. Then we have the county medical examiner
prepared to offer evidence showing extensive damage to Martin's knuckles.

Somebody is lying. Who do you suppose is lying?


This is a pretty good assessment:

What Zimmerman, Martin medical reports tell us and the media didn't
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The new medical reports on the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin case tell us a lot. And it is
not just for what they find, but also what they don't find.

First, the reports provide striking evidence that Zimmerman did not start the fight with Martin,
and that Zimmerman shot Martin in self-defense. Martin's injuries were two-fold: broken skin on
his knuckles and the fatal gunshot wound.

Zimmerman's injuries involved: a fractured nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back
of his head and a minor back injury.

It takes considerable force to break the skin on multiple knuckles. The large range of injuries on
Zimmerman indicates that the Martin's attack was prolonged. But here is what is missing: where
are the injuries to Zimmerman's hands? Where are the bruises on Martin's face or other parts of
his body? The evidence paints a picture where Martin was the only person landing blows.

.....
Bottom line: the medical reports about George Zimmerman are revealing a lot more information
than the media have so far let on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Where are the mainstream media retractions ......in 100 point bold print? Why haven't charges
against Zimmerman been dropped?
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1141
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2310751 - 05/17/12 10:32 AM

.
Top, because SurferMag page breaks hid my post.
..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23021
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: squidley]
      #2319728 - 06/01/12 07:14 PM

Zimmerman ordered back to jail and bond revoked after he misled judge about his finances and got outed for withholding a second passport in recorded conversation with his wife. So much for his credibility.

--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 11950
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: A different perspective - Martin vs. Zimmerman [Re: frvcvs]
      #2319769 - 06/01/12 08:15 PM

Quote:

Zimmerman ordered back to jail and bond revoked after he misled judge about his finances and got outed for withholding a second passport in recorded conversation with his wife. So much for his credibility.



Wow. Your racism is once again on full display.

A hispanic man is "cornered into lying" by the pigs and you just fall right in line with pig propaganda.

Unreal.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)



Extra information
17 registered and 92 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Groundswell, Administrator, Nameless60 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 13071

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Surfermag.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.4