REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.


General Discussion >> Surfer Discussion

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"?
      #2319865 - 06/01/12 11:12 PM

If Black Sea Bass (or whatever your pet species is) are going extinct, why is this NOT Darwin in action even if us malignant tumor humans (ie. homo-sapien animals) are the indisputable the cause of their demise?

This Animal would like to know.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bloomies
Phil Edwards status
**

Reged: 09/27/08
Posts: 7250
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319868 - 06/01/12 11:19 PM

It's far too simple for you to understand.

--------------------
If the logical end of communism is the gulag, then the logical end of capitalism is the Mafia.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
the janitor
Michael Peterson status
**

Reged: 03/28/03
Posts: 2762
Loc: north of the bridge
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319869 - 06/01/12 11:24 PM

says the gender confused kneeboarder

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dkennedys11
Miki Dora status
**

Reged: 07/17/06
Posts: 5037
Loc: beneath the blue suburban sky
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: bloomies]
      #2319872 - 06/01/12 11:33 PM

Its simple: keeping things balanced means more resources for us.

Think about it...is it not in our best interest, as humans, to keep the ecosystem in balance? Its not a purely altruistic cause...once animals start going extinct it messes up everything. If a fishery becomes depleted we can not longer utilize it.

--------------------
Bomb Hills not Countries.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: bloomies]
      #2319874 - 06/01/12 11:37 PM

Quote:

It's far too simple for you to understand.




For some odd reason you and like minded people cannot explain yourselves on this subject.

A Christian nut-ball will at the very least attempt to explain where they're coming from whereas an Enviro-Weenie just says shite as if it's just true, can't back it up, and is utterly flabbergasted when someone actually calls them out on the $hit that they're spewing.

I could walk into the Vatican Lunchroom at high noon, declare that God doesn't exist and have a more rational discussion about the existence of God than if I were at a Sierra Club meeting and expressed some skepticism about whether or not Sea Bass should be "protected" by Homo Sapiens.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: dkennedys11]
      #2319875 - 06/01/12 11:40 PM

Quote:

Its simple: keeping things balanced means more resources for us.

Think about it...is it not in our best interest, as humans, to keep the ecosystem in balance? Its not a purely altruistic cause...once animals start going extinct it messes up everything. If a fishery becomes depleted we can not longer utilize it.




Nature is dynamic, there is no such thing as "balance".

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dkennedys11
Miki Dora status
**

Reged: 07/17/06
Posts: 5037
Loc: beneath the blue suburban sky
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319879 - 06/01/12 11:58 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Its simple: keeping things balanced means more resources for us.

Think about it...is it not in our best interest, as humans, to keep the ecosystem in balance? Its not a purely altruistic cause...once animals start going extinct it messes up everything. If a fishery becomes depleted we can not longer utilize it.




Nature is dynamic, there is no such thing as "balance".




Ok well fair enough on the "balanced" thing but eliminate that word and the rest remains true. We need certain things from the ecosystem and it is beneficial, therefore, for us to sustain it. No?

--------------------
Bomb Hills not Countries.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: dkennedys11]
      #2319880 - 06/02/12 12:04 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Its simple: keeping things balanced means more resources for us.

Think about it...is it not in our best interest, as humans, to keep the ecosystem in balance? Its not a purely altruistic cause...once animals start going extinct it messes up everything. If a fishery becomes depleted we can not longer utilize it.




Nature is dynamic, there is no such thing as "balance".




Ok well fair enough on the "balanced" thing but eliminate that word and the rest remains true. We need certain things from the ecosystem and it is beneficial, therefore, for us to sustain it. No?





So Homo Sapiens need Sea Bass to survive?

The vast majority of Humans not only do not depend on Black Sea Bass for their survival they probably don't even know WTF a Black Sea Bass IS.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23260
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319881 - 06/02/12 12:06 AM

Why are we so worried about the unborn when we have no desire to take care of the born?

--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: frvcvs]
      #2319882 - 06/02/12 12:07 AM

Quote:

Why are we so worried about the unborn when we have no desire to take care of the born?



Speak for yourself asshole.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RbrOutlier
Gerry Lopez status
**

Reged: 06/04/11
Posts: 1233
Loc: Rubber
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319892 - 06/02/12 02:06 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Why are we so worried about the unborn when we have no desire to take care of the born?



Speak for yourself asshole.







Quote:

Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"?


??

great question !!

--------------------
establish Justice, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Malarcus
Duke status
**

Reged: 01/10/02
Posts: 16239
Loc: Roadstreet Ln.
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319895 - 06/02/12 02:50 AM

I think the real question is why you put "protected" in quotes? Are they not actually being protected?

--------------------
"I consider going right a different sport." -BaliIdiot

Surfy, Surfy!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
neinfore
Phil Edwards status
**

Reged: 02/24/05
Posts: 6619
Loc: under a volcanic rock
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319899 - 06/02/12 03:38 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Its simple: keeping things balanced means more resources for us.

Think about it...is it not in our best interest, as humans, to keep the ecosystem in balance? Its not a purely altruistic cause...once animals start going extinct it messes up everything. If a fishery becomes depleted we can not longer utilize it.




Nature is dynamic, there is no such thing as "balance".




no, but there is Pi!

3.14etc....

peas,

9'4''

--------------------
so, rolling stone gather no moss, eh?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Haoleboy
Gerry Lopez status
**

Reged: 06/02/02
Posts: 1160
Loc: East of Town
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: neinfore]
      #2319900 - 06/02/12 03:39 AM

It's an intriguing question. So...where do we draw the line?
Maybe Sea Bass isn't such a big deal. Let them be over-fished into extinction...who cares?
Polar Bears? Who needs 'em? They only eat seals and scare tourists. Whales...Pssh. Let them die. Can't be that smart if they allow themselves to be harpooned.
Tuna?...Hell, get the nets out, same goes for eagles and owls and snails and squirrels and rhinos and snakes and elephants and hawks and dolphins and tigers and just about every other creature on the planet.
Who needs them? If we can kill them, they must be weak...

Should only the strong be allowed to survive?

Maybe as the top dog of the planet, we should act as caring stewards instead of arrogant butchers. (Not you C.S...I'm sure you're not a butcher )
It seems to me that it is in our collective benefit to have a planet with a diverse and thriving Eco-system. It makes for a better and more beautiful place to live.
Who knows? Maybe the cure for Gingivitis lives in the liver of the Sea Bass.
And besides...Sea Bass tacos are tasty. A managed fishery means I can grind them for another decade, providing my teeth don't fall out first.
Just my opinion.


--------------------
HOOOO-TAH!!!!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Malarcus
Duke status
**

Reged: 01/10/02
Posts: 16239
Loc: Roadstreet Ln.
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Haoleboy]
      #2319902 - 06/02/12 03:45 AM

Also, too? While your question may indeed be a valid argument, this:

"Nature is dynamic, there is no such thing as 'balance'."

is dynamically ignorant. And from a surfer, no less.

--------------------
"I consider going right a different sport." -BaliIdiot

Surfy, Surfy!

Edited by Malarcus (06/02/12 03:47 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
royallen
Billy Hamilton status
**

Reged: 01/30/09
Posts: 1674
Loc: the swamp
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Malarcus]
      #2319903 - 06/02/12 03:49 AM

Equilibrium is reached and maintained until a trigger event. Chaos ensues, followed by a new equilibrium.

--------------------
Everything you know is wrong


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
neinfore
Phil Edwards status
**

Reged: 02/24/05
Posts: 6619
Loc: under a volcanic rock
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Malarcus]
      #2319904 - 06/02/12 03:49 AM

personally, i'm fully behind that chaos theory thing.

so, you know.

what does anything really matter when there is no meaning to anything anyways, right?

peas,

9'4''

--------------------
so, rolling stone gather no moss, eh?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
royallen
Billy Hamilton status
**

Reged: 01/30/09
Posts: 1674
Loc: the swamp
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: neinfore]
      #2319905 - 06/02/12 03:53 AM

Chaos does not negate meaning. Chaos is not random.

--------------------
Everything you know is wrong


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SoupGrom
Michael Peterson status
***

Reged: 04/20/02
Posts: 2975
Loc: Vicco
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319908 - 06/02/12 03:59 AM

Quote:

If Black Sea Bass (or whatever your pet species is) are going extinct, why is this NOT Darwin in action even if us malignant tumor humans (ie. homo-sapien animals) are the indisputable the cause of their demise?

This Animal would like to know.




Because as sapient animals, we have a choice.

--------------------
First Church of the Outstreched Palm, Healing Light, Mystic Expeirience, and Perpetual Surf.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Malarcus
Duke status
**

Reged: 01/10/02
Posts: 16239
Loc: Roadstreet Ln.
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: neinfore]
      #2319909 - 06/02/12 04:01 AM

Quote:

personally, i'm fully behind that chaos theory thing.

so, you know.

what does anything really matter when there is no meaning to anything anyways, right?

peas,

9'4''




No, Donny, these men are nihilists...



There's nothing to be afraid of.

--------------------
"I consider going right a different sport." -BaliIdiot

Surfy, Surfy!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Fuller
Rabbitt Bartholomew status
**

Reged: 01/10/02
Posts: 9922
Loc: Mechanized hum of another worl...
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Malarcus]
      #2319916 - 06/02/12 05:18 AM

Don't you ever get tired of trolling this forum with questions like that?

We've done this before, you didn't get it then and you won't get it now. Go away.

--------------------
"I am sorry but I think it is beyond repair so the test may be over."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
buttholesurfer
Duke status
**

Reged: 12/20/02
Posts: 29611
Loc: RatBeach
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: bloomies]
      #2319921 - 06/02/12 05:51 AM

Quote:

It's far too simple for you to understand.






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SharkBoy
Michael Peterson status
**

Reged: 10/22/04
Posts: 2581
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: buttholesurfer]
      #2319928 - 06/02/12 06:33 AM

I'll bite.
Maybe we should see things as healthy or not healthy instead of right or wrong. Right or wrong are human concepts anyways and don't always seem to jive with natures 'cruel indifference'

If we think of our planet and the animals as a system that needs to be healthy, then wouldn't the healthier decision be to take care of it?
Or would you rather eat junk food, smoke, get fat and just call the diseases growing in you as just part of nature.

--------------------
Like a blind man at an orgie, I was gonna have to feel my way around.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Steak
Kelly Slater status
**

Reged: 11/09/10
Posts: 8466
Loc: No Country for Old Men
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319970 - 06/02/12 07:07 AM

Here's something along this line to ponder.

Around these parts we have a protected little seabird, the
Snowy Plover.

The State of California in it's infinite wisdom ropes off
large stretches of public beach which are off limits to the
public to keep people from stepping on Snowy Plovers or
their eggs.

These same areas are also chock full of feral cats who have
taken up residence on the nearby bluffs in the brush. You go
down to the beach and see tufts of Snowy Plover feathers
blowing across the sand and large feral cats but you never
see any Snowy Plovers.


There are no feral cat traps being put out so they must
obviously not be considered a threat by our supremely
intelligent eco overlords.



--------------------
The magnetic mass has destroyed his circuits.

We will start again.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Steak]
      #2319971 - 06/02/12 07:27 AM

Quote:

Here's something along this line to ponder.

Around these parts we have a protected little seabird, the
Snowy Plover.

The State of California in it's infinite wisdom ropes off
large stretches of public beach which are off limits to the
public to keep people from stepping on Snowy Plovers or
their eggs.

These same areas are also chock full of feral cats who have
taken up residence on the nearby bluffs in the brush. You go
down to the beach and see tufts of Snowy Plover feathers
blowing across the sand and large feral cats but you never
see any Snowy Plovers.


There are no feral cat traps being put out so they must
obviously not be considered a threat by our supremely intelligent eco overlords.





Environmentalism is just a religion for the Godless.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Haoleboy]
      #2319976 - 06/02/12 07:49 AM

Quote:

It's an intriguing question. So...where do we draw the line?



My question is more to the WHY do we draw the line issue.

As usual, the only thing I get from brain dead drone "liberals" (not directed at you btw)when I pose this question is idiocy like this:

"We've done this before, you didn't get it then and you won't get it now"

Or this:

"It's far too simple for you to understand"

Neither of these 2 numbskulls can articulate their position yet both seem to think that they're operating on some higher plane.

A fundamentalist Christian will at least be honest and tell you why he believes what he believes, Orthodox Environmentalists don't even know WHY they believe what they believe.....other than that acting superior makes them feel really good about themselves.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Autoprax
Michael Peterson status
**

Reged: 01/24/11
Posts: 3134
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319979 - 06/02/12 08:00 AM

Are you really worried that humans are being overly conservative when it comes to resources?

You see that as a problem?

The conservation movement is just an attempt to apply the brakes but rest assured the brakes will fail and team exploitation will have its way.

Have you ever throughout of moving to China?

They aint saving no basses.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Autoprax]
      #2319982 - 06/02/12 08:04 AM

Quote:

Are you really worried that humans are being overly conservative when it comes to resources?





What makes Black Sea Bass a "resource"?

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RbrOutlier
Gerry Lopez status
**

Reged: 06/04/11
Posts: 1233
Loc: Rubber
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319984 - 06/02/12 08:08 AM

should lion and elephants be hunted to extinction ??

--------------------
establish Justice, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: RbrOutlier]
      #2319987 - 06/02/12 08:11 AM

Quote:

should lion and elephants be hunted to extinction ??



Are you going to go hungry if sea lions and elephants disappear?

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bloomies
Phil Edwards status
**

Reged: 09/27/08
Posts: 7250
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319989 - 06/02/12 08:28 AM

Quote:

Quote:

It's far too simple for you to understand.




For some odd reason you and like minded people cannot explain yourselves on this subject.

A Christian nut-ball will at the very least attempt to explain where they're coming from whereas an Enviro-Weenie just says shite as if it's just true, can't back it up, and is utterly flabbergasted when someone actually calls them out on the $hit that they're spewing.

I could walk into the Vatican Lunchroom at high noon, declare that God doesn't exist and have a more rational discussion about the existence of God than if I were at a Sierra Club meeting and expressed some skepticism about whether or not Sea Bass should be "protected" by Homo Sapiens.




You retarded khunt..... far from being a "greenie-weenie", I'm a fisherman first and foremost. I like to eat what I catch. I serve on a board of commercial and recreational fishermen, we are dedicated to keeping people fishing at both levels. It's called "management" and "stewardship". No one who can think logically wants to be the person who catches the last fish of any species.

The quotes are for your "understanding" or lack thereof. It is telling that you bring religion into this discussion of yours. One of the great minds (obviously) that believes at some base level that god will restore the bounty if it's required.....

Enjoy your Safeway/Von's supplied tilapia sandwich later today.

--------------------
If the logical end of communism is the gulag, then the logical end of capitalism is the Mafia.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: bloomies]
      #2319990 - 06/02/12 08:34 AM

Quote:

It's called "management" and "stewardship". No one who can think logically wants to be the person who catches the last fish of any species.





So it just boils down to you not wanting to eat the very last Jalapeno Popper at the fishermans happy hour and you dress up this act with words like "stewardship" and "management" in order to make you feel good about yourself?

Which branch of Mother Nature elected you "manager" btw?

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Autoprax
Michael Peterson status
**

Reged: 01/24/11
Posts: 3134
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319991 - 06/02/12 08:37 AM

So you think it should just be anything goes?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
squidley
Gerry Lopez status
*

Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 1172
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319992 - 06/02/12 08:40 AM

.
We have a duty not to extinct species just for the hell of it.

We have a duty to provide for ourselves and our loved ones.

We have a duty to protect ourselves and our loved ones from species which try to harm and kill us.
This duty includes driving species which try to harm and kill us to extinction.

We have a duty to mitigate the collateral damage done to innocent bystander species while protecting
and providing for ourselves. Compromise is the key. Militant tree huggers are unwilling to compromise,
because they value lower life forms more than humans.

We owe it to ourselves to manage the population of species which we kill and use for our benefit
....such as black sea bass. If they go extinct, the problem is not limited to their loss.

It is our loss.
..

Edited by squidley (06/02/12 08:57 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CharmingSophisticate
Tom Curren status
**

Reged: 03/07/09
Posts: 12180
Loc: In Gods Country
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: Autoprax]
      #2319993 - 06/02/12 08:49 AM

Quote:

So you think it should just be anything goes?



No- I like to be surrounded by pretty animals too.

No one will go hungry if Black Sea Bass become extinct and the ecosystem won't collapse, it'll just change the way your aquarium looks.

It's a pretty fish.

--------------------
"...now tell me that wasn't fun!"
Capt. Jack Aubrey


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bloomies
Phil Edwards status
**

Reged: 09/27/08
Posts: 7250
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319996 - 06/02/12 08:54 AM

When Squidley points out your idiocy....that ought to be enough.

--------------------
If the logical end of communism is the gulag, then the logical end of capitalism is the Mafia.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frvcvs
Duke status
**

Reged: 02/27/09
Posts: 23260
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: squidley]
      #2319997 - 06/02/12 08:56 AM

Quote:

We have a duty to protect ourselves and our loved ones from species which try to harm and kill us.
This duty includes driving species which try to harm and kill us to extinction.




Really?

--------------------
"[Rush] doesn't influence me either - merely reinforces what I already know" - 23rdstMB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RbrOutlier
Gerry Lopez status
**

Reged: 06/04/11
Posts: 1233
Loc: Rubber
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2319999 - 06/02/12 08:58 AM

Quote:

Quote:

should lion and elephants be hunted to extinction ??



Are you going to go hungry if sea lions and elephants disappear?




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_hunting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephant_hunting_in_Kenya







--------------------
establish Justice, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
urchin
Michael Peterson status
**

Reged: 10/20/04
Posts: 2135
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2320004 - 06/02/12 09:27 AM

Quote:

If Black Sea Bass (or whatever your pet species is) are going extinct, why is this NOT Darwin in action even if us malignant tumor humans (ie. homo-sapien animals) are the indisputable the cause of their demise?

This Animal would like to know.




Didn't you just answer your own question? If we are the cause, then it's nothing to do with natural selection. It's just murder.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SlicedFeet
Michael Peterson status
**

Reged: 12/16/04
Posts: 2580
Loc: Swarm Diego
Re: Why Should Certain Animal Species Be "Protected"? [Re: CharmingSophisticate]
      #2320005 - 06/02/12 09:27 AM

Quote:

If Black Sea Bass (or whatever your pet species is) are going extinct, why is this NOT Darwin in action even if us malignant tumor humans (ie. homo-sapien animals) are the indisputable the cause of their demise?

This Animal would like to know.




It is survival of the fittest - Darwinisns. We are part of the environment thus they need to adapt or perish. That's part of the the tenants of Evolution.

Humans though have another characteristic which we act upon. We see Apathy. In the majority of us, a dopamine effect is produced when we fight against it. We get this nice cuddly, feel good, euphoria and that's why want to support all current species and see that we are good care takers.

See...God knew drugs were good and built some inside us.


--------------------
"God, please protect me from your followers"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)



Extra information
30 registered and 116 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Groundswell, Administrator, Nameless60, tenover, r32 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 6806

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Surfermag.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.4