REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.
stubster
Gerry Lopez status
Reged: 03/13/08
Posts: 1113
|
Re: PORN XXX -6'0" Oak Foils Dyna-Glyde Stubby (Pickle)
03/11/09 02:13 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
stupid question;
what's the difference between the RFC "Speed Dialers" and
the Futures Stretch Quads?(performance differences...of course)
I finally got a Stretch "Fletcher" quad, and am curious about
different fins for it.
very nice "pickle" btw! 
co
The RFC Canards work on my quad fish when the waves are bigger; tons of drive! On regular days, they feel too stiff. Stretch Quads feel great in all conditions.
In the stubby, the Stretch quads were way too skatey since the board surfs like a board much shorter. The board needs to be finned a little bigger. The RFC Canards feel really good without being over skatey, probably because they stiffen the board up a little, which compensates for it being over skatey.
On a shortboard or fish, the Stretch quads are good for most people. I tend to like the VII Quads more on my boards to loosen it up a little. Stretch Quads are 439 fronts with 400 rears. The VII Quads are 438 fronts with 375 rears. I've tried the Stretch 439 fronts with 375 rears and it didn't feel right.
|
|
Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.4
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Edit
Reply
Quote
