REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.
MidPointMafia
Grom
Reged: 05/26/08
Posts: 125
|
Re: Twinzer Feedback
03/19/11 04:58 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is clearly a reason for the reverse rake of the main fins in this set-up. Not having personal experience with it. I can't speak to the how the flow runs. I would be very interesting to observe in an flow tank.
This type a thing.... cliky
Then put a turning vane/leader fin with a matching trailing edge in front of the cutout...
Just saying. Not arguing merits.
An improvement on McCoy's big *single* using the template, though, I would think.
The difference between air and water is so significant that the only comparison that can be made is force against foil. How this foil reacts against the two is so radically different it isn't worth considering.
|
|
Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.4
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Edit
Reply
Quote
